I'll talk specifically about the Roadster, because that's what I have.
It's been said the maximum reliable power you can run the Smart Suprex engine at with reasonable reliability is 120-125bhp. Above this they like to throw a rod or fail in some spectacular way. The standard Roadster engine has all the hardware necessary to run it's engine to the limit. All you need to do is turn up the boost with a remap (commercial remaps only sell up to about 115bhp for reliability reasons, but there are 120+bhp maps available). Forget everything you've heard about induction mods and silicone pipes etc. Personally I believe they are largely a waste of money and only introduce possible problems (there are plenty of blown off pipe stories around). If you take a 100% standard Roadster, with original airbox, intake, exhaust etc exactly as it left the factory and install a 115bhp remap, what do you get? You get a 115bhp Roadster. What does this mean? It means when you turn up the turbo boost the car, as it is, is quite capable of taking in all the extra air, and blowing it all out again through the exhaust. This demonstrates quite nicely how the standard induction system, and exhaust system do not limit the power of the engine. So what happens if you take a standard 80bhp Roadster and install all the intake mods under the sun, and a nice sports exhaust to boot? The result is a very noisy 80bhp Roadster! Look at it this way. A standard Roadster boosts to 1.0Bar. After doing all those mods it will still boost to 1.0Bar (look at the Turbo gauge if you don't believe me!) The car's ECU tells the Turbo to open until 1.0Bar of air pressure is reached, and then hold it there. So the air entering the engine is completely controlled by the turbo. Doesn't matter what intake modifications you have done, no more air is allowed in to the engine! And if no more air is allowed in, then no more can come out. So there's no point having a less restrictive exhaust (from a performance point of view at least).
So does anyone disagree with this theory? If so, which parts are flawed and why?
Let the debate begin!
(You might guess I have nothing to do at work today!
)
It's been said the maximum reliable power you can run the Smart Suprex engine at with reasonable reliability is 120-125bhp. Above this they like to throw a rod or fail in some spectacular way. The standard Roadster engine has all the hardware necessary to run it's engine to the limit. All you need to do is turn up the boost with a remap (commercial remaps only sell up to about 115bhp for reliability reasons, but there are 120+bhp maps available). Forget everything you've heard about induction mods and silicone pipes etc. Personally I believe they are largely a waste of money and only introduce possible problems (there are plenty of blown off pipe stories around). If you take a 100% standard Roadster, with original airbox, intake, exhaust etc exactly as it left the factory and install a 115bhp remap, what do you get? You get a 115bhp Roadster. What does this mean? It means when you turn up the turbo boost the car, as it is, is quite capable of taking in all the extra air, and blowing it all out again through the exhaust. This demonstrates quite nicely how the standard induction system, and exhaust system do not limit the power of the engine. So what happens if you take a standard 80bhp Roadster and install all the intake mods under the sun, and a nice sports exhaust to boot? The result is a very noisy 80bhp Roadster! Look at it this way. A standard Roadster boosts to 1.0Bar. After doing all those mods it will still boost to 1.0Bar (look at the Turbo gauge if you don't believe me!) The car's ECU tells the Turbo to open until 1.0Bar of air pressure is reached, and then hold it there. So the air entering the engine is completely controlled by the turbo. Doesn't matter what intake modifications you have done, no more air is allowed in to the engine! And if no more air is allowed in, then no more can come out. So there's no point having a less restrictive exhaust (from a performance point of view at least).
So does anyone disagree with this theory? If so, which parts are flawed and why?
Let the debate begin!
(You might guess I have nothing to do at work today!
)



Comment